1) Oh yeah, I forgot to remove the control removal from there! It's ezpz and done. I had added &showinfo=0&controls=0 after each youtube link on each gallery, to intentionally remove the controls, as I said. Now I removed it.
4) There's not much I can think of to improve those buttons, but we could remove those buttons from small screens only using simple CSS, such as:
@media screen and (max-width: 700px) {
div.page-desc{
display: none;
}
}Morning!
1) I see the navigation bar now and it's as good as can be for feeding the video through YouTube. I loved it without, but the viewer needs it.
4) The buttons on the HP are duplicates of the ones under ABOUT. I need to review with my client and decide which set stays and which goes.
5) I noticed carousel type navigation arrows over each video. I suppose the thumbnail and video are being viewed as two different items. Is that something that will be solved by removing the video thumbnails, same as with problem #2?
Looks like we're reaching an end soon!
2) Done. It was rather simple.
5) I usually never add more than 1 video to the gallery for this code, so I never noticed those navigation arrows before. I like it there! 
We can remove it regardless of #2. Probably the best way to do it is using 1 video per gallery. You may notice they don't show on any of the career videos. That way it's also easy to go back if you want in the future.
Beautiful! 
And apologies for the delay--finishing up the to-do list before hopefully launching tomorrow, fingers crossed, and did not get a notification you had wrapped it all up. The ONLY issue I noticed was that the control bar on the CAREER acting reel video is missing again, perhaps the code got deleted by accident. Could you put it back in?
Thank you much! 
No idea how that sneaked in there. :o
Now we're basically finished, I wanted to say a few things...
This new Lisa website looks so much better than the old one! 
And then, as someone who's aspiring (probably in the too distant future) to make a movie (and this is the farthest I've got), I wished I had something more to say, ask or share. But right now I don't. I guess I'm just glad by this little coincidence. 
Finally, as much as I now better understand why you may wanted to keep this private, I still see no real big deal here. I would really appreciate if you could find some time to sanitize out whatever you want from here and give me an ok to move this into public. That being said, I suppose it's also not quite that much of a big deal to just leave it as it is. I just hope most or all of next ones we can make in public.
Cheers! 
You are hilarious! 
I meant to reply to your post sooner, but could not stop following your links and reading on about your failed attempts at making movies, or discovering your calling... not to mention third time is sadly not the charm in your case!
That being said, you should know that you are very much TOP in my book, so carry on, my friend! 
You should also know that I very much intend to stay in touch and converse on numerous topics, most if not all of which public. So, if you don't mind, let's let this one slide. Deal? 
Thanks a million for all your help again!
Cheers!
P.S. I am glad you like the new site "much better". The question is how much and is that enough?! 
Thanks, so much for all the praising, and for bringing me work. 
If it's enough, only time will tell. I suppose you're wondering that because there was some sales goal for her behind it. And I'm in no position to give advices on marketing... Maybe I should even consult with your web branding specialty later on, when I start getting enough sales. Looks like you're in a similar path as I in that sense.
Anyway, I did find it way more beautiful!
I think it has a lot to do with how squarespace promotes using images, and the fresh looking layout that will also look old in a few years. But it has also something to do with the simplicity, which never gets old. That's what have always made Google and Apple look so great since their beginning.
Any reason why there's no blog in the new one, though? That'd sure help directing some traffic towards it.
No, thank YOU!
You are correct, only time will tell if the site has served it's purpose. The site was essentially meant to be a visual resume of a sort, and "beautiful" was a key word for the project. Obviously, right up there with clean, minimal, functional, user-friendly, and fresh. Granted, websites don't tend to be timeless, but rather trendy. And sooner than later, within 3-5 years, they become outdated. So, let's hope it's enough!
To answer your question, her blog is linked to the site, but Squarespace does not support the Blogspot icon, so I had to add it as a link. She has no desire to contribute and maintain the blog any longer, but wishes for users to still have access to her old content, thus the less prominent position on the site.
Also, we are about to go live, hopefully within the next few hours and I want to make sure I can remove you as a contributor and transfer ownership to my client safely, without affecting any of the code (not sure if you are the author of any of the content). Please confirm that it's ok to proceed.
And a big THANK YOU again--could not have done it without you!
Dani
